• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Worldwide network to enhance the science, policy and practice of ecosystem services for conservation and sustainable development

    • Log in
    • Newsletter
    • Contact
  • Community
    • Member Portal
    • ESP membership
      • Individual membership
      • Institutional membership
      • List of members
      • Member organisations
    • Working groups
      • Thematic Working Groups
        • TWG 1 – ES Assessment frameworks & Typologies
        • TWG 2 – Biodiversity & Ecosystem services
        • TWG 3 – ES Indicators
        • TWG 4 – Mapping ES
        • TWG 5 – Modeling ES
        • TWG 6 – Integrated valuation of ES
        • TWG 7 – Economic & Monetary valuation
        • TWG 8 – Cultural services & Values
        • TWG 9 – ES & Public health
        • TWG 10 – ES in Trade-off analysis & Project evaluation
        • TWG 11 – Global ES Flows
        • TWG 12 – ES & Disaster Risk reduction (DRR)
        • TWG 13 – Role of ES in Ecosystem restoration
          • TWG 13A – Biomimetic Solutions
        • TWG 14 – Application of ES in Planning & Management
        • TWG 15 – ES & Poverty alleviation
        • TWG 16 – ES Financing mechanisms (incl. PES)
          • TWG 16A – Tree-based PES (PESFOR-W)
        • TWG 17 – ES Accounting & Greening the economy
        • TWG 18 – Governance & Institutional aspects
        • TWG 19 – Big data & Digital communication
        • TWG 20 – Equity in Ecosystem Services research
      • Biome Working Groups
        • BWG 1 – Marine systems
        • BWG 2 – Freshwater systems
        • BWG 3 – Forests & Woodlands
        • BWG 4 – Drylands
        • BWG 5 – Mediterranean systems
        • BWG 6 – Deserts
        • BWG 7 – Tundras
        • BWG 8 – Polar regions & High mountains
        • BWG 9 – Rural landscapes
        • BWG 10 – Urban systems
      • Sectoral Working Groups
        • SWG 1 – ES in Agricultural production systems
        • SWG 2 – ES in Fishery & Aquaculture
        • SWG 3 – ES in Forestry production systems
        • SWG 4 – ES in Mining, Energy and Transport systems
        • SWG 5 – ES in Water management
        • SWG 6 – ES in Business
        • SWG 7 – ES in (eco) Tourism
        • SWG 8 – ES in Conservation
        • SWG 9 – Indigenous peoples & Local communities
        • SWG 10 – ES in the circular (bio-)economy
    • Regional chapters and National networks
      • North America
        • USA – NESP
        • Canada
      • Central America & Caribbean
        • A. Central America
          • Costa Rica
          • Guatemala
        • B. Caribbean
      • South America
        • Brazil
        • Colombia
        • Sur América – Español
      • West & Central Europe incl. Russia
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • France
        • Germany
        • Italy
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Switzerland
        • The Netherlands
      • South-East Europe
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Greece – HESP
        • North Macedonia
        • Malta
        • Montenegro
        • Romania
        • Serbia – SESP
        • Turkey
      • MENA Middle East & North Africa
        • Israel
        • Jordan
        • Lebanon
      • West & Central Africa
        • Cameroon
        • DRC
        • Liberia
        • Senegal
        • Togo
      • East & Southern Africa
        • Kenya
        • South Africa
        • Zimbabwe
      • West & Central Asia
        • Kazakhstan
      • East Asia
        • China
        • Japan
        • Republic of Korea
      • South & South-East Asia
        • India
        • Indonesia
      • Oceania
        • Australia
        • New Zealand
    • Task Forces
    • Young ES Specialists (YESS)
    • ESP Asia Regional Office
  • Services
    • Networking
    • Journals
    • Case studies & Key sites
    • Data & Knowledge sharing
    • Education & Training
      • ESP Webinar Series
    • Guidelines & Toolkits
    • Relevant newsletters
  • ESP Conferences
    • Regional conferences
    • World Conference 2025
    • Previous conferences
  • Partners
    • Partner organisations
    • Related networks
    • SELINA Project
    • ESMERALDA Project
    • Become a partner
  • Sponsors
    • Become a sponsor
    • Become a member organisation
  • News
    • ESP Update
    • Latest news
    • Events
    • Vacancies
  • About
    • Governance
      • Interim Executive Committee
      • Executive Committee
      • Steering Committee
      • Issue commissions
      • Advisory board
    • Media & ESP
      • Acknowledgements
    • Foundation for Sustainable Development
    • Privacy Policy and Disclaimer

Assessing the impacts of conserving Lesser Spotted Eagle in Latvia

September 21, 2021 by Veronika Kiss Categories: Collaboration calls, News

The “Conservation arrangements for Lesser Spotted Eagle in Latvia” (LIFE AQPOM) project has focused on the complex conservation of the bird’s alarmingly declining population. The project created new habitats for the eagle and for his preys and ensured safe pylons around the habitats of the bird. In our socio-economic impact and ecosystem services assessment we analysed how the project contributed to the well-being of impacted stakeholders (grassland and forest owners) and revealed how different ecosystem services (biomass and carbon sequestration of project sites) were changed due to project interventions.

In regard to the evaluation of these two essential forest related ecosystem services, we found that the protected nesting sites not only served the purpose of preserving the Lesser spotted eagle but also improved the condition of the biomass and the carbon sequestration ecosystem services and indirectly, other ecosystem services. Therefore, due to the fact that relevant forest owners do not extract their trees, their property can continue to provide essential forest related ecosystem services (on top of biomass and carbon sequestration also e.g. deadwood, which can be used for firewood).

In terms of socio-economic impacts, we found that the project has contributed to the socio-economic development of grassland owners, not only from an economic perspective via increasing their income, but also through providing them social benefits such as increasing sustainable land management practices, reviving agricultural traditions and the personal satisfaction of the opportunity to conserve nature.

Regarding forest owners, we found that the project has enhanced their livelihood via increased ecosystem services delivering different social benefits, but also also from an economic perspective considering state support for Natura 2000 sites and other benefits (e.g. firewood).

In case you are interested in the whole assessment, contact us.

Primary Sidebar

Become a member!

Subscribe to newsletter

Already a member? Login below:


Forgot Password

Follow us on:

Footer

Regional Chapters

  • North America
  • Central America & Caribbean
  • South America
  • West & Central Europe incl. Russia
  • South-East Europe
  • MENA Middle East & North Africa
  • West & Central Africa
  • East & Southern Africa
  • West & Central Asia
  • East Asia
  • South & South-East Asia
  • Oceania

Working Groups

  • Thematic Working Groups
  • Biome Working Groups
  • Sectoral Working Groups

Follow us on:

Copyright © 2025 · Foundation for Sustainable Development · Privacy Policy and Disclaimer · Log in · Implemented by Co-Capacity

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkRead more